Top Law Firm Invests $8.2M in Legal Research Company Casetext | LawSites

Fueled by interest in its new brief-automation product, the legal research company Casetext said today that it has raised $8.2 million in new funding in a round led by “one of the top revenue-generating law firms in the country.” It did not disclose the name of the firm.

Casetext cofounder and CEO Jake Heller said the additional funding would be used to invest more heavily in Compose, the product the company unveiled last month that automates the creation of the first draft of a litigation brief.

This brings the total investment in Casetext to over $40 million. Several existing investors also participated in the round, including Union Square Ventures, Canvas Ventures, and Y Combinator Continuity.

“We’re honored to have one of the top law firms in the country as Casetext investors,” Heller said in a statement on the funding. “I view this investment as validation that the legal industry shares our vision for the future of law — and believes we’re the right company to build it.”

As I wrote when Compose launched, the product is designed to help lawyers create first drafts of litigation briefs in a fraction of the time it would normally take. Users select from an index of arguments and standards tied to the type of motion and jurisdiction, and the product inserts fully composed paragraphs, including citations.

Notable New Casetext Product Drafts Your Litigation Briefs For You

Biglaw Firm Reinstates Coronavirus Work-From-Home Policy After Blowback From Employees

Thanks to the incredibly contagious coronavirus outbreak, Biglaw firms across the globe have had to close their physical offices and encourage attorneys and legal professionals to work remotely. Some areas of the world have been more successful at flattening the curve and are now attempting to reopen their businesses — but employees are still incredibly worried about their health.

Earlier this week, a Chicago-based Biglaw firm tried to bring its Hong Kong workforce back to the office and employees were less than pleased considering that COVID-19 had recently started making a comeback thanks to lifted social-distancing restrictions. Lawyers and staff members were so shocked and outraged over the proposal that an anonymous letter was sent to firm management.

Which firm received pushback over its questionable decision?

Mayer Brown received a sharply worded letter from employees after they found out the firm planned to reopen the office. “You are putting us, our families and our communities at risk for no good reason,” the letter’s authors wrote. Law.com International has additional details on the letter’s contents:

The letter blasted Mayer Brown for telling lawyers and staff that they should return to work in the office. It also said the firm had failed to provide any support to those employees who had children at home. Hong Kong’s schools have been closed during the crisis and are not expected to reopen until late April.

“We want to express our dismay at the position the firm continues to maintain in the face of a global pandemic. You insist that we still come to work despite a grand majority of other Hong Kong firms, companies and government offices providing the option for employees to work from home,” the letter said.

The firm has since reinstated its voluntary work-from-home policy for all employees, which is a good thing, because one of its employees recently tested positive for COVID-19 and has been hospitalized. Mayer Brown noted in a statement that “[t]he health and safety of our people—each and every one of us— takes priority over everything else and is the only factor in play as our local leaders react in real time to a rapidly unfolding global human tragedy.”

Is your firm planning to make adjustments to its work-from-home policy anytime soon? Please email us or text us (646-820-8477) and we’ll update our policy tracker.

Mayer Brown’s Efforts to Reopen in Hong Kong Backtracked After Employees Raise Concerns [Law.com International]


Staci ZaretskyStaci Zaretsky is a senior editor at Above the Law, where she’s worked since 2011. She’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to email her with any tips, questions, comments, or critiques. You can follow her on Twitter or connect with her on LinkedIn.

Working Parents Are Not Okay Right Now. How To Balance The Strain Of A Legal Career With Everything Else.

(Image via Getty)

Everyone knows that the legal profession has to deal with the issue of mental health — the field is high stress and time intensive which just causes a whole host of problems. Then if you add being a working parent into the mix, you’re talking about a stress multiplier. Oh, and did we mention there’s also a global pandemic going on? It’s enough to make to pull out your hair.

In this week’s episode of The Jabot podcast, I speak with Summer Eberhard, managing director in the Associate Practice Group at Major, Lindsey & Africa. Summer is a working mother who advises young lawyers on negotiating their parental leave. We discuss some of the issues facing working parents in the legal industry and what can be done about them. We also chat about the mental health strain living in quarantine — Summer lives in Seattle where they’re quite familiar with social distancing — puts on working parents.

The Jabot podcast is an offshoot of the Above the Law brand focused on the challenges women, people of color, LGBTQIA, and other diverse populations face in the legal industry. Our name comes from none other than the Notorious Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the jabot (decorative collar) she wears when delivering dissents from the bench. It’s a reminder that even when we aren’t winning, we’re still a powerful force to be reckoned with.

Happy listening!


headshotKathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).

Trump Administration Botches Terrorist Prosecution Over Death Penalty Fixation

(Photo by Zach Gibson/Getty Images)

A shibboleth of right-wing American politics is a steadfast commitment to the death penalty as a moral good unto itself. Innocent or guilty, all that matters is the machine of Judge Dredd-level violence roll on. Government officials aren’t even above making illegal transactions with shady overseas drug dealers to keep it going. And now, courtesy of a decision from the UK Supreme Court, Jeff Sessions and Mike Pompeo and the rest of the Trump crew appear to have botched the prosecution of a pair of notorious terrorists rather than just give up on the death penalty.

Way to go, guys.

El Shafee Elsheikh and Alexanda Kotey are allegedly a pair of ISIS executioners that the U.S. has successfully captured. They were UK citizens until the Brits stripped them of their citizenship, but the UK doesn’t want to attempt prosecuting them out of concern that they might fail to secure a conviction. However, the United States has a lower bar to clear on that score, making it convenient to just let the Americans go ahead with the case since they already have them in custody anyway.

But, of course, the UK has banned the death penalty and requires its government to receive assurances that other countries won’t seek the death penalty before handing over investigative material that could be used in a trial.

After talking to Trump’s team, the Tory government realized they weren’t going to get that and decided to go ahead and illegally hand over the material anyway. The UK Supreme Court is… not pleased with this.

According to documents, Jeff Sessions complained to the former UK Home Secretary that “the U.S. should not be left to assume responsibility for ‘other nations’ terrorist fighters,’” an uncharacteristic departure from American Exceptionalism — these people murdered Americans, Americans have them in custody, America should be ready to prosecute them. Whether or not that’s the proper international norm, that’s absolutely the norm the Republican base wants to see.

And the cognitive dissonance probably stems from this all being a bluff to force the UK to turn over the extensive evidence it had gathered on the pair. At the very hint that this transfer might be conditioned upon a death penalty waiver, the former UK ambassador to Washington wrote:

“Their reaction is likely to be something close to outrage,” Darroch warned, adding that it might “wind up” President Donald Trump.

“They already feel that we are dumping on them a problem for which we should take responsibility. They have been signaling to us for weeks now that we are in no position to attach any conditions to this,” he wrote.

Thus, in spite of its legal obligations, the UK government wrote Sessions explaining that they had no problem with the death penalty and handed over the material. Unsurprisingly, this seems to have ended the administration’s outrage over prosecuting two former British nationals.

The UK Supreme Court, delivering a video opinion because of coronavirus, was appropriately flabbergasted:

In his judgment, Lord Robert Carnwath concluded that the information in question was transferred “without any safeguards at all.”

He said the decision was based on “political expediency, rather than consideration of strict necessity under the statutory criteria.”

The court criticized the British government for abandoning a “principled approach” to the death penalty because it was “coming under, and might become susceptible to, political pressure from the U.S.”

The justices said there were suggestions that “pragmatic considerations, at the expense of a principled approach, might begin to influence the UK’s reaction to the demand that it should cease its lobbying in relation to the death penalty assurances.”

Make no mistake here, Jeff Sessions and the rest of the Trump team have undermined — perhaps, but not necessarily, fatally — the prosecution of American-killing terrorists because they couldn’t let go of the death penalty. Is this really a higher principle than getting justice? The risk that their collective manhood would be wounded by holding these folks in prison for life was so dire that they risked the possibility of convicting them at all. Get your priorities straight, people!

Now, robbed of this evidence, the U.S. will have to be content renditioning these people to some black site and hold them forever without oversight. The good news for the administration is that unlike the Brits, the U.S. Supreme Court has little to no stomach for telling its political branches “no.”

U.K. broke law by sending evidence on ISIS ‘Beatles’ to U.S., court rules [NBC News]


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

Immigration Lawyers And Judges Beg To Suspend Court And Open Detention Centers Before People Die

Remember when, two weeks and about a million years ago, the Department of Justice told the immigration courts to take down CDC handwashing posters, in direct violation of good public health practices? At the time, ATL editor Kathryn Rubino wrote “Whether it was nefarious or just a petty office politics squabble, it is not a good look.” Well, while you were busy dealing with the collapse of our society, the evidence has been increasingly pointing to “nefarious.”

Let’s start with the immigration courts, which somehow are not entirely closed. In fact, none of them were closed until March 18, three days after all the professionals who work in the courts (including ICE prosecutors) called for it, and one day after an immigration judge in Denver came down with suspected COVID-19. (More positive tests came from the Boston court March 19 and New York City’s Varick Street March 23.) As of March 25, the courts are still hearing cases of detained immigrants, but lawyers and judges are calling for a complete shutdown.

Why the sluggish response? It might be relevant that immigrants who don’t show up to their court hearings are automatically put into deportation, even if they’re medically required to stay home. In addition, the Miami Herald has discovered that the DOJ “and ultimately the White House” are deciding whether and when to close individual courts, a fact that carries a distinct odor of politics. We will assume without evidence that “the White House” means Trump advisor and noted fan of white supremacist literature Stephen Miller, who also came up with the family separation policy.

Meanwhile, tons of immigrant prisoners — excuse me, I mean “civil detainees who have not necessarily been convicted of any crime” — remain in ICE jails, waiting for COVID-19 to rip through their close quarters and substandard health facilities. Detention center employees in Elizabeth, New Jersey, and Conroe, Texas, have already tested positive for the virus, as has an ICE detainee at the Bergen County jail in New Jersey. At least four lawsuits have been filed demanding the release of high-risk immigrants in New Jersey, Washington, California, Pennsylvania, and Texas.

In response, DHS has not only failed to release anyone, but has required immigration attorneys who enter the facilities to bring their own protective surgical masks and gloves. Yes, even though medical professionals are already so desperate for masks that they’re asking volunteers to sew them some! Despite the widespread use of videoconferencing in the immigration courts, videoconferencing between detainees and their attorneys is not currently on the table. As a long list of advocacy groups pointed out in a March 23 letter to the immigration courts, this effectively denies immigrants their statutory right to meet with their attorneys.

That all of this puts native-born Americans — particularly the xenophobic older people who make up Trump’s voter base — at risk does not appear to have occurred to our leaders. Let’s hope it doesn’t take nursing homes full of dead grandparents to change their minds.


Lorelei Laird is a freelance writer specializing in the law, and the only person you know who still has an “I Believe Anita Hill” bumper sticker. Find her at wordofthelaird.com.

Former CEOs’ Pay Docked For Hurting Banks’ Reputations With Scandals Of Which Banks Say They Are Wholly Innocent

SA 21-day lockdown: Zimbabwe to feel the pinch – The Zimbabwean

As South Africa goes into a 21-day lockdown Thursday midnight, as part of a raft of measures to contain the deadly Coronavirus (COVID-19), it goes without saying that Zimbabwe, which imports a variety of products from Africa’s most industrialised economy, will feel the pinch.

South African President, Cyril Ramaphosa, on Monday said the country would go into a 21-day lockdown from midnight of 26 March to midnight of 16 April 2020 as part of the measures to deal with COVID-19.

The number of confirmed cases in South Africa leapt to 709 on Wednesday.

During the shutdown shops and businesses will be closed, with the exemption of pharmacies, laboratories, banks, the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, supermarkets, petrol stations and healthcare providers.

Health workers, emergency personnel and security services will be allowed to work, while soldiers will be deployed to patrol the streets in support of the police.

Ramaphosa, however stressed South Africans will still be able to leave their homes to seek medical care, buy food or collect a social grant.

There is no doubt that Zimbabwe, which imports 40 percent of its raw materials from South Africa will be negatively affected by this lockdown.

Matabeleland which has over the years relied on cross-border traders, popularly known as omalayitsha bringing foodstuffs into the country every month is set to be affected by the lockdown.

Social commentator, Methuseli Moyo, told CITE the looming South African lockdown had created uneasiness in Matabeleland.

“The lockdown has caused anxiety among both business and residents in the region because of the reliance on SA for supplies and stocks,” said Moyo.

“That is why suddenly there are queues at grocery shops and meat suppliers. There is fear that food might run out during the lockdown.”

He added: “Most small and even some big businesses utilise omalayitsha for logistics and restocking, and if those are grounded there could be challenges. The alternative would be to rely on local goods sold at markets, such as those at Old Renkini and Entumbane bus terminus.”

Moyo emphasised the need for locals to know the choices available to avoid being taken advantage of by unscrupulous traders, some of whom have since more than doubled prices.

Khanyile Mlotshwa, another social commentator, said the lockdown means it will no longer be business as usual for those who would want to travel between Zimbabwe and South Africa during the lockdown.

“Business will be low because people will not be moving around especially in Johannesburg which is the disease’s epicentre,” said Mlotshwa.

He added Zimbabweans wishing to send goods home during the shutdown were likely to face challenges since human movement would be curtailed.

National Consumer Rights Association (NACORA) spokesperson, Effie Ncube, said the lockdown would affect livelihoods north of the Limpopo.

“As a result of the lockdown, there is going to be tremendous hunger and suffering in the country,” said Ncube.

“Do not forget that by closing the borders you are not just protecting the people from externally transmitted Coronavirus cases but you are also closing off mealie-meal and other basic commodities that people depend on. Remember the country is no longer a manufacturing country so most of the basic commodities that people depend on are not manufactured in Zimbabwe. They have to be imported.”

Economist, Prosper Chitambara, said the shutdown would heavily weigh down on the Zimbabwean economy affecting the supply chain, considering 40 percent of its imports come from South Africa.

Morning Docket: 03.26.20

* The star of the hit Netflix docuseries The Tiger King has filed a lawsuit alleging that he was framed as part of a massive conspiracy. Now I really need to watch series… [TMZ]

* Lawyers are predicting that social isolation will lead to higher divorce rates in the months to come. [CNBC]

* It seems that along with divorce attorneys, wills and estates lawyers are in high demand because of COVID-19, and certain attorneys are preparing so many wills that some are being signed on the hood of a Porsche. [Bloomberg Law]

* The attorneys general from 33 states have sent a letter to Amazon, Walmart, and others asking them to crack down on price gouging related to COVID-19. [NPR]

* Federal officials are forcing attorneys to wear gloves, masks, and other protective gear to represent clients in certain immigration detention centers. However, some attorneys argue that this could be taking equipment away from healthcare workers. [Denver Post]

* A Native American tribe has sued a group of insurance companies seeking coverage for casino closures under a business interruption policy. Depending on the policy language, this could be a huge gamble… [Insurance Journal]


Jordan Rothman is a partner of The Rothman Law Firm, a full-service New York and New Jersey law firm. He is also the founder of Student Debt Diaries, a website discussing how he paid off his student loans. You can reach Jordan through email at jordan@rothmanlawyer.com.

I am sorry – The Zimbabwean

My name is Godfrey Tsenengamu. I am a young Zimbabwean politician and some of you could be knowing me from the past in so many different ways, good and bad.

After some critical reflections and introspection on my past political life and experiences, I have decided to come before you all to express myself in the best way possible.

It is my heartfelt desire that I open a new chapter marked by a new set of priorities, focus and direction dedicated to serving Zimbabwe and beyond.

Looking back at my past, I strongly believe that it is a reality that cannot be wished away hence the decision to take personal responsibility and ask for your forgiveness and find peace with my past.

Today, I humble and submit myself before you all my fellow countrymen, especially those Zimbabweans whose activities, views and opinions I would not appreciate, tolerate or accept and all the Zimbabweans in general, to say I AM SORRY for all the negative things I ever said, did or caused on you and your loved ones in any way that you may remember or have experienced.

It pains me to look back at my past and realise that so many a times I overlooked your happiness in an attempt to make myself happy, only to realize that my happiness lies in yours. I stand here to admit that a majority of times, I was selfish and self-centred and now feel ashamed of every negative thing I ever did, said or caused in my past. I haven’t got any excuses for whatever that I did, said or caused in the past. I take full responsibility for myself and my actions. I will not pawn this off on anybody. I am sorry it happened as I did hurt you directly or indirectly and in so many ways i.e. physically, emotionally or otherwise . Having taken this decision, I would like to reiterate that it is possible to turn from our selfish ways and refocus our energies to collectively building a Zimbabwe where our children are guaranteed of a prosperous future.

Personally, I have equally decided to take the conscious and deliberate decision to release my feelings of resentment, grudges, bitterness or vengeance towards those whom l felt offended me in any way in the past and I now feel relieved with my consciousness having been restored.
I have realised that if I continue to hold on to hurt, pain, bitterness, resentment and anger, it harms me more than it harms those whom I feel offended me. I therefore decided to forgive those who offended me as this effectively brings healing and comfort to many of us as such a decision prevents and saves us from corrosive anger and negative emotions that may have a negative effect of polluting and defining us in the present and future.

I have learnt from my past and realised that any man who desires to revenge by killing another person should dig two graves as he will also die from his green wounds of bitterness and a stressful life. I therefore choose to live in the present where solutions will arise as I take lessons from my past experiences and commit to work and live in harmony with all progressive and peace loving Zimbabweans.

Once again, I am sorry Zimbabwe and continue to beg for your pardon though l may not deserve it.
I know this might be a difficult proposition but I believe Zimbabwe stands to benefit more should we give chance and room to forgiveness, harmony, mutual tolerance, true love and mutual respect for each other.

I thank you.

Signed : Godfrey Tsenengamu

Post published in: Featured

Partners Feeling The Economic Pinch Of Coronavirus — See Also

U.K. Firm Stops Shareholder Payments: The publicly traded firm wants the added liquidity during the pandemic. 

Are Law School Graduations Happening During COVID? You tell us.

Working During A Pandemic Isn’t Easy: Especially if you’re a lawyer.

Despite The Corona-Madness, Chicago Law Keeps Its Grading The Same: And folks are pissed.

Law Student Opens Up About Her COVID-19 Diagnosis: She wants to increase awareness about young people and the pandemic.