Introducing Embroker: The Secret To Faster, Cheaper, And Better Malpractice Insurance

Let’s be honest – insurance is one of those things no one likes thinking about. It’s also one of those things everyone knows they need. Law firms are no exception – the ABA estimates that 80% of lawyers will be sued for malpractice at some point in their careers, with the biggest targets being small firms and solo practitioners.

No firm wants to be caught without professional liability insurance when something goes wrong, but the process of obtaining it has always been time-consuming, antiquated, overly expensive, and just downright dreadful.

Until now. Insurtech company Embroker is radically changing the way companies, including law firms, find insurance. By replacing antiquated processes and high overhead costs with technology and algorithms, Embroker allows law firms to find the right coverage at a fraction of the hassle and cost they’re used to.

If you’re like most firms, you’ve incorporated plenty of legal tech into your practice because it saves time and money. Now it’s time to add some insurtech to your arsenal and break free from the dreaded insurance cycle.

The Old Way of Doing Things

If you’ve ever applied for insurance for your firm, you know how it goes: a broker sends you a PDF of the application that ranges anywhere from 9 to 40 pages long, you spend up to 10 hours answering questions and providing information that will never be used (or a lot more if you’re a large firm), you send the PDF back to the broker, the broker sends it to the underwriter, then you wait weeks until you eventually receive a quote. If you want to make any modifications, the cycle repeats, and you finally end up with coverage a month or more later. 

While the ultimate cost of your insurance depends on factors like how many lawyers you have, where you practice, and the kinds of law you practice, only half of the money you’ve been spending on any insurance policy has been going toward actually paying claims.

That’s right – half. So, what’s the other half? Overhead and distribution costs – personnel and manual, antiquated processes like all that back-and-forth with the brokers and underwriters. 

This other half is where Embroker comes in. By injecting technology, Embroker eliminates the processes that have long been overly expensive and allows you to pay just for the thing you really want – the insurance.

How Embroker Works

Remember that tedious, lengthy PDF application? Embroker has done away with that. Instead, Embroker’s landing page for legal customers takes you straight into the online application.

First, you provide your basic, high-level information, like your name, address, industry, revenue details, and contact information, and Embroker immediately analyzes and confirms your business profile to make sure you’re eligible as a law firm for professional liability insurance. Once you pass that initial step, you answer some simple questions about your law firm’s practice, including areas of law, how many attorneys you have, where they practice, the kind of cases the firm handles, the firm’s risk management processes, and past legal incidents. These questions aren’t designed to disqualify you from coverage, but rather to quantify your risk and determine your coverage qualifications. If you currently have insurance, Embroker will try to align any new policies with your current coverage.

The entire application process takes about 10 minutes – a fraction of the time even the simplest PDF application has historically taken. Your application then goes through an automated underwriting process and you get an actual premium quote in a matter of seconds. From there, you can tweak your requirements by increasing limits, decreasing deductibles, requesting loss-only deductibles, designating your claims expense treatment, adding claims and defense limits, and much more – adjustments you might not have even known were options for lowering your incremental costs and better protecting your firm and its finances.

The automated underwriting process again quickly generates your premium quote. You can print a PDF of the customized quote and your specimen policy if you need to obtain approval, or you can bind your policy then and there, digitally paying through the Embroker website. Your policy is immediately available and accessible at any time.

Better yet, this speedy process is even faster if you’re a returning customer. Your renewal application will have your basic information pre-filled for you, and the underwriting process takes as little as three to five minutes.

What’s glaringly missing from this process is all the back and forth you’re used to with traditional insurance applications, and that’s a great thing. Even with multiple rounds of tweaking coverage requirements, you can still obtain a quote in well under an hour and get coverage that’s binding today. 

By now you might be asking yourself why you would ever apply for insurance the traditional way again. The answer? You wouldn’t, and you shouldn’t.

The End Result

Professional liability insurance is usually one of the first purchases law firms make, and one of their largest expenses. Having 50% of that expense go to overhead, distribution, and costs that have nothing to do with actual coverage just makes no sense. The cost of insurance that represents actual claims you face will always be a reality of practice, but Embroker’s technology and algorithms can dramatically reduce the other half.

You still get quality insurance from the same top, A+-rated carriers, and you often get better coverage because you can easily pick the policy terms you want. You just spend a lot less money to get it. If you’re a Clio user, you save even more – as the endorsed broker for Clio, Embroker offers Clio users a 10% discount.

In addition to professional liability coverage, Embroker offers digital products for law firms’ other property and casualty needs, handled the same way through Embroker’s fast, automated underwriting algorithms. With it all, you get technical support and helpful risk management resources. 

When it comes to running a law firm, you want all your processes to be better, faster, and cheaper. For malpractice insurance, Embroker fits the bill. You get a more cost-effective product without sacrificing coverage.

No one earned a law degree to spend time getting bogged down in administrative tasks like applying for professional liability coverage. With Embroker on your side, insurance is one less hassle to worry about. With the time you save, you can focus on serving your clients and growing your firm.

Highland Capital Not Alone In Not Having To Pay Huge Judgments Against It

Lawyers, You Should Go Ahead And Call Your Grandma

It’s always good to keep up with Legal Evolution, a blog edited by Indiana-Maurer’s Professor Bill Henderson. A great repository of commentary on legal industry innovation, often with a heavy dose of hard data which is generally lacking when lawyers talk about themselves.

With layoff stories coming at us from every angle these days, a video posted on the site this week offers a nice change up and reminds everyone to put things in perspective and do something nice. It’s a “call to action” video from Professor Henderson’s class and it asks everyone to take the time out of their day to remember to reach out to older folks — an important message generally but an especially poignant one now, with seniors often locked away from contact with the outside world.

As we close out the week of bad news and snark, here’s something nice and genuine.

A nursing home changed this law student’s life (149) [Legal Evolution]

Mass Incarceration: As Rational As A 5-MPH Speed Limit

COVID-19 is slicing through our densely populated prisons and jails, where people are unable to practice social distancing or good hygiene. In Ohio, for example, five percent of the state’s prison population has tested positive, including more than 1,800 people at one facility. As the infection rate and death toll rise, pressure is building on governors, sheriffs, and other elected officials to thin the incarcerated population by releasing sick and elderly prisoners who are most at-risk from the disease, as well as people who have been arrested for lower-level offenses.

Sadly, most elected leaders are resisting this pressure, and it’s clear the reason for their hesitancy is fear. They worry that someone released will commit another crime. Actually, it’s more accurate to say that they worry someone released will commit another crime and they, the elected leaders, will get blamed for it. We already have seen everyone’s nightmare play out. Last week, a man arrested for drug possession and held on a $2,500 bond was released on his own recognizance in order to combat the spread of COVID-19 in a county jail. The next day, the man allegedly murdered someone.

The fact that a tough-on-crime Florida sheriff permitted the release or that the man could have easily found the $250 required to post bond and secure his own release did nothing to quell the howls from the usual corners. This individual tragedy would be used to make a broader argument. No one should be released, we are told, lest anyone commit another crime. Or,
as Baltimore’s police commissioner said recently, “One murder is one too many. Zero murders should always be the goal.”

That sounds good. After all, who is willing to risk the deaths of innocent people?

It turns out we all are.

Everyone supports policies that result in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans every year. Roughly 40,000 people die every year in traffic accidents. Thousands of others are permanently injured. We could almost certainly could eliminate at least 90 percent of traffic-related deaths if we reduced the speed limit to 5 miles per hour and banned left turns. Think about it: We could save 36,000 innocent lives every year if we all were willing to add some time to our daily commute. But are we?

The list of activities that result in unnecessary deaths is long. Air pollution cuts short the lives of 90,000 to 360,000 people every year in the United States. Pools, trampolines, and motorcycles kill and maim thousands more. Sugary drinks are associated with a higher risk of early death. Alcohol’s death toll is higher than deaths due to guns, cars, drug overdoses, or HIV/AIDS ever have been in a single year.

There are policies could reduce every one of these death totals dramatically, but we recognize that the cost would be too high, so we tolerate them. We don’t do it out of callousness or mean-spiritedness. We all just accept that life comes with risks and rewards, costs and benefits, and we must weigh these things when making policy. We are not indifferent to loss, but we recognize that we cannot eradicate risk.

Except, it seems, when it comes to justice policy.

The idea that we can prevent all crime is no more reasonable than the idea that we can eliminate all traffic accidents and alcohol-related deaths. But in an effort to pretend they can achieve the unachievable, leaders from both political parties have pursued extreme sentencing policies — mandatory minimums, “Three Strikes” laws, etc. — that are the cost-benefit equivalent of a five-mile-per-hour speed limit, or the prohibition of alcohol.

The result? The United States now has the world’s largest prison population. Like a 5-mph speed limit, our radical experiment in mass incarceration comes with significant costs. Lengthy incarceration breaks up families, ends relationships, and is correlated with poorer health outcomes and earlier death. But the costs aren’t limited to the incarcerated or their innocent families. Politicians’ irrational approach to crime ironically leaves the public less safe, as resources that could be invested in successful crime prevention efforts are instead wasted on unnecessary incarceration.

The same goes for releases from jails and prisons in the wake of COVID-19. The fear that anyone released might commit another crime has led some politicians to oppose all such releases. But, again, this approach could leave the public less safe. After all, refusing to release low-risk people leaves them in prison, where they are at relatively higher risk of sickness from the coronavirus. Treating them adds to the burden of an already overtaxed health care system; a ventilator being used by a would-be releasee left in prison is a ventilator unavailable for your grandmother. As a result, it’s possible that failing to release relatively low-risk people from prisons and jails threatens more lives than it will save.

It’s time to grow up. We need to recognize that no public policy is perfect. Every proposed solution comes with costs and benefits, and tradeoffs are unavoidable. Justice policy is no different. Thinking clearly about crime and punishment does not require indifference to the suffering of victims of crime; their experience is an important part of the relevant balance. The best way to approach these issues with the same dispassionate analysis we use in every other area of life that involves risk.

Our leaders should not be paralyzed by fear, especially now. As the death toll in prisons and jails rises from the spread of COVID-19, their intolerance of any risk is going to cost many more lives than it will save.


Kevin Ring is a former Capitol Hill staffer, Biglaw partner, and federal lobbyist. He is currently the president of FAMM, a nonprofit, nonpartisan criminal justice reform advocacy group. Back when ATL still had comments, “FREE KEVIN RING” was briefly a meme. You can follow him on Twitter @KevinARing.

Add a Looming Rise in Employment Class Actions to COVID-Related Concerns [Sponsored]

%PDF-1.4 %���� 1 0 obj << /Creator (Apache FOP Version 2.3) /Producer (Apache FOP Version 2.3) /CreationDate (D:20200422110524Z) >> endobj 2 0 obj << /N 3 /Length 3 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode >> stream x��gPTY��{� �M���I��$�$A��@w�i��AQdpFI� ���AFQŀ((��N#��2�”**K�٭�U[�g��x�sO�s�[��1������M��:�1��C�H�(�JN�����!���c����sϑ��>��qy�v�y����%��.��ʱlN2k�w�r4;�-�� 8=%1�{�i��W�-�o�!�o�V��k������Z�kL�0+���t�j� +���|iA/�o3���`?�(��O��f+�y�S/T�����7����o��r�L@�ʿr��`�Q�WN��=t����8@W)��X���o9���Ȁ��

r���”�dQ�(s�+*�JG�*PM��5�(j��F���hS�:��F����ї���)�”���hc,1^�pL �S�9����Lc>` X�!� ��b��l/v;�]Ɖ�Tq�8/��+�5�zpwqӸe�^o�����w�+�m�k�’�A�`F�!�v* g7���D Q�hO%��O/ߒH$5� )��B�Oj&]%=#}��芸��ErEjD:EFD^�qdU�-y+9�A>G�K�ʼn��ڋ����=/:.�(F3�K+k�)6K�P�(�6%�r�r�2EEP���Tu��z�:MC��i��XZ�G�mA�”n$ �!^#~Q�OG����xz �,}��IBN�V�#�O�MbDbIRF�F�#Y(�.9*�I�!�(‘u@�K�4RZK�G:]��5�y���K�P��cYXVK�W6[��좜������U�yy���|�|�|��U�J!F���K�8ÖϨd�3e]S����ԕ��ڕ�*㕙ʑ���}�* *�*9*�*�Uq�L�h�ê�Kj�j�j{պ�f�%�]ճ�[՟h�4�5�44h�5��q�G4�i�Z�Z�Z5Zw�am��#���P���q�5��!�����L��u=t�t�t_������o��ߨ?a@1p3�3�1��PːeXc�`=i��������iq��=4�{�5�3�bbj�3i3�3U1 3�5gҘ��b� 3���Y�����&�)�g���б��h��ݠ����qÔ��e�e�%ߊafůo�hn�`��Fنm�d3c�ik{��Ϯ�n���~��e���C�Ð#��߱�񙓒S�S�ӂ��s��e�����qW9W�k�낛���~w��&�j��Z<�O����瓍��������A�����I޿�}�}j|^����l�nڶ�e�{?;��  �T��r@h@s�R�C`Y ?H/hG��`����LH@HS��f�͇6O����mQߒ���V��[/n#o�v.��9�+�!|1�5�6b�e�:�zŶa���8��2�L�edY�l�e���h������7�.�u�Kq^q'�V���� a �n�����Éډ��$�CI<�?�p<< /Type /Metadata /Subtype /XML /Length 6 0 R >> stream
application/pdf x-unknown 2020-04-22T11:05:24Z Apache FOP Version 2.3 1.4 Apache FOP Version 2.3 2020-04-22T11:05:24Z 2020-04-22T11:05:24Z
endstream endobj 6 0 obj 964 endobj 7 0 obj << /Name /Im1 /Type /XObject /Length 8 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode /Subtype /Image /Width 157 /Height 26 /BitsPerComponent 8 /ColorSpace /DeviceGray >> stream x�͗ilTU��L[J[`b[ k��m�Vٔ��Җ�%”K�%@@Y�”e'(“�”�JD���.�@� �D ��B$(hd *3��u��s�{3ShC�i8��s�]��s�{C�ˀ�5 �ު�^�N��_*�BM���d^�B�$�o�!��n�A���4�)�F.��f2e���t�|��ty>O�핒�֖�a� ۻܠY1��}�j��V�y�����FŐ���Q�m��c�D%NJ�]Hm;[o�ׄ�h���n�U��70�#j���”�xUzkH����v�����I�=G�.�d�`A0�^.7���”�X��)�&�����7:G�(+~T�”�N�+��”v,!z���5�F� %j |�^�;qKw��p�G74���O�v�I�m’Z��N]�W��g�-�ix�L���b�B�U�C�J�D���e�9�}�Jgkp� 8��&���)��f��ψ��a��g��4�<'p���-��pU̿@Ϣ9�P�>‘��2�h.�n8Z����)��l�|��Ft�$��zdr��%[V�3+;�*8r��Z4�_��Q�tR��D�ţ�Q�y1/�w���͸�eS5�z��i��=��@� Jœ�2�&b�T�2�W�5�����F�;”�&*’�c.�����I�)����b�q]jd��a�c�o���^��Eg����u6��^��q{}�̙-�袋20���1U�܉��p(�?�|Ρ�4�cC��7;�E�y����I��Y�dOR�J�r��RhN��������P�U>Q�XJ�{��5X��G�A�4G�WX �1�c�h .���=u�UjL���T*Ki�Z��U�� �j|t�Q��Y�f3�9X�_PP0��'[��+�,q���-����L8�y�_�S�����Xē��$�z�����ke�c,�x�O�T�/��9U��V�L3���pD��e� J�#ʄ�)�=��b�|�0��#8_eR^�����(���0S4�$���D=,R�zV�ͻ�����(r��M��R�KB�%V�7�N�]kG�%6�V�����q�z�����#=���^DG�g�v��_ S��*`���)um��’�A�� �]��X���jU�LU�`82D�,HQ1����J�*�ɔF7��_>’ф��J�JX�����7��%���JeS�.W�q�>A���M�b~St��l�:r�b���_UO���)&�O4���Ҙ�=�f�|��t��NF�ӥ����x����b����Y����6�l�9C��x��GZ(�99���7���[l��/nz�� [vgs�%��u�����dnw�xW�?j��$a�;�ϟ��412�$A�?i endstream endobj 8 0 obj 1384 endobj 9 0 obj << /Name /Im2 /Type /XObject /Length 10 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode /Subtype /Image /Width 157 /Height 26 /BitsPerComponent 8 /ColorSpace [/ICCBased 2 0 R] /SMask 7 0 R >> stream x���kL�W�#2�ˢ�n�ܢ��)ZT��Nq�O��dʭЋ@[[h��֖�fs���m’8]����^U.�)-���dYf�,�Y̲%[^�6��M���Ó����$7 %?ɪz߮�km��v��8 �m�Nk�qB�����a�Ѐ�ߘ��׌�1�D>��’f:kk4���p�);����[���j�`�ɉT�d��n��nc�����g�P�(:| �G���P�P�R6Ec�S±B�i2����ݝ��gU ��’�[���v����˞@�yp�Ɏ�?Q,?q�VӶ��=�R�x�h�sJ8�qhog�C�ڼY O.��3:}Tw�;����S���6�L�x��J�Z�� �~c�H�8W�”��/`Ec�<�£Q����4�PVh~fpI����V텧���̝'���d�Ć��[�gn��3�Ǽ��u��,��19���|�m��a��'08�7�� ��}����� ~F��Mz��a��Z=�z{�v�;I2��⟅���[�r�������uA�v�F��2d��bo�ځ�.��1�bv๬�@pY��mB��|�O���A�+��@aJ�sU��$��,�ԿF6�QRE�ޏy��i��'�ĕ��<�ИT�J_T���^�Xbf$��J�t���;hե���L��0���q��O<�gD�+�o��j�q���Ev�A��L3;~��'�T��rt)��bu2O���J�����$���y�܍D��ܞ��d� �drt���5^�D���|���#|@%�ш1�B&C���fbe��V�v��Ȝ(0�@�~u� /w�,d@��"ue�-��1$p�S�W�#�Ⱦ6��a>��H�f��+’:x� l�b�6@S��kw���vF���ŧ �C53��O���Dǜ/1�*�Hі;g���X �.9�/R�W��Ba߲����]��-2’HW��-�����Jex�”�jqu::�c�y�o�-w��}O:}���Be��,��AG|��q�� �^2�S��R��?��a�s�%��p�Z���� �VUYS���fxK0�ş$��)�=<< /URI (http://prod.resource.cch.com/resource/scion/document/default/eld0177349cfc7d9210009e9e005056881d2303?cfu=BC&cpid=WKUS-Legal-Cheetah&uAppCtx=cheetah) /S /URI >> endobj 12 0 obj << /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link /Rect [ 56.692 683.432 526.504 697.418 ] /C [ 0 0 0 ] /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /A 11 0 R /H /I >> endobj 13 0 obj << /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link /Rect [ 56.692 664.532 506.26 678.518 ] /C [ 0 0 0 ] /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /A 11 0 R /H /I >> endobj 14 0 obj << /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link /Rect [ 56.692 645.632 222.074 659.618 ] /C [ 0 0 0 ] /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /A 11 0 R /H /I >> endobj 15 0 obj << /URI (https://prod.resource.cch.com/resource/scion/document/default/eld0177349cfc7d9210009e9e005056881d2303?cfu=BC&cpid=WKUS-Legal-Cheetah&uAppCtx=cheetah) /S /URI >> endobj 16 0 obj << /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link /Rect [ 56.692 603.758 218.112 613.748 ] /C [ 0 0 0 ] /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /A 15 0 R /H /I >> endobj 17 0 obj << /URI (https://www.employmentlawdaily.com/index.php/author/lisa-milam-perez/) /S /URI >> endobj 18 0 obj << /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link /Rect [ 71.122 584.589 142.102 594.579 ] /C [ 0 0 0 ] /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /A 17 0 R /H /I >> endobj 19 0 obj << /URI (https://www.jacksonlewis.com/people/stephanie-l-adler-paindiris) /S /URI >> endobj 20 0 obj << /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link /Rect [ 489.472 436.836 545.502 446.826 ] /C [ 0 0 0 ] /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /A 19 0 R /H /I >> endobj 21 0 obj << /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link /Rect [ 56.692 423.336 121.562 433.326 ] /C [ 0 0 0 ] /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /A 19 0 R /H /I >> endobj 22 0 obj << /Length 23 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode >> stream x��ˎ+���W���W�M 0���dg�^^%q��u`o��!�U��GK�I��b ��I��ԃ�~~ыJ��_B4˟���L���էkf_���V���z��o�����_�`�ZL��eT�����|s�a����Gؤ’�<�ٖ/_�����J���:�(ws�w?,_��r���-,i\��a�to�2�/Ѥ�!Skº���7�j���y�m�"���h"���3�/�uLh�z�V�P� Zm�/1TngNvz���5�]��=�N�2�7b׹�>>kC�-�}���q4o��׿���n5��V�m��V�<�>�d9a6kLY���6��Ba�ER�LJ��Ir:II_��Y�:IA’)�+q}��4�?_i|z6�ہp^� �Q���1nOP���M�dg�C�d�R�9��B������Y�>���GF��3���y#2=���{Ŷ,�q���xO�Ӝ��+��oݵ�_��g �����B�K޺���)�n�” 1����nXs3��]�{��ٚ’�+�C��ʝ�Ӭu�g ��u�3$t���)zM� ��I�j^*��^�*ee�,n��I7��B����p��?���3��jC�Ä@��<�!͠��9<��i�̊8����[�~��5H��|��@ޘ�fN��1�{櫌 �n�VE~;��S47�Y�k5�8�U�]t���.���*�� � �N���D�kA��5�(�5��0�Uۿ&̤lUE? u�n?.{��=�*���W%!5^���/�*�m0��k��)}�4���רZ<�kd�%���bb���%���F��:�1l����F~+��W5�c��H �6_� �=P��,����<4nnL'���3<0����9�o�}��j,&�|80�k��")���5�q�oDR ����07���UUL>!��X>�d�c }E�x�hxc�P�Y�s�� �0o��E��n=~�J2��� xh�� ��s�2w�g��P����~��k�Vr�+ίND I������G` `�l�F^����/:�f���%A� b6 L ѣ��ޣU������=sd�U�u���F<���0A����r9;�@WD��b��8]�!E������n��1�Kг8N��ʅ�J�z�bm#�>��,�S��˛r|��TQ�T�ĭ�6�J��R��:�����Q����[zkua����0�?� c=�٘�:ϧ�M�s�����~�”�ּ%OPu�6H�*v>%ʭ��L�X�q�ù�{.��I�.�7M�q� �:V��3�[D�5?��֧��?g�<� ���K�km�RՀ�>�Id��&�M���=����� �E�1���,eX�f�*�{a�Jp�<�M�U5���=�*������C�i���3�����V�k��K�笕�YC�T��>U���, -Z#ٶ�ȼ1ͪW�-���|(��r�ݒ�لH<����5z,'��=V�Av� Mྺ�� C5��~R�5�a_��ﰦ0c �셷���o�H���9��MU,�rW2��ȸky���f�př��|F��Χu�OҚ.���Q�s�U�dHr�a�ۥ ��{�5@�6���6R �wz���t����kS"�;������Nῑ���jT�5��H���y��{��)�h��:� �LW�l�U�ZՒ���M4s�)v<�ƻY��#�?�Q�n(�t�s� ]��{��Q��w���Ќ��n�`�ǂ�!F��-kJ�sT��G�f�rW<�6.���I�g�ش����-��@�SvM������`�LƮ=X:�H�o��_��[ћ�wz�&_ˋq��&�N�r��v<+&æŲ�C6�U��z�la��0ۦ͜�{v�&�tb���7�|i�tn�����c�ֳn߹�3�<��C��M�^��l�m��*�u��`�,�������4��!�XsϛdǼ�j�u`'���� ��`C�C�0g�y*�ϭ2q��d�Yk���A�� Ό p7I�po)��fs� `���2���1I�j�Ng#��.q�ɞ�,D��j�2��b�?����v��?�ڞlj�J�1����-[?���:E$���b"����{�����C�6�O�S1��x=ϝ4�y���jl�`X���kC #���B�Y����X� �y�� Q' 9[�TȤ��$~�c�l^c0�`��h�ZІk�X�R�K5��f�7�r7��A{�b#Poʏ��X*��([��oP��,�T���ƭ���Z�5�%;e���c��@v�ZTD:n^vգA�s��"�bU�V�>y�⫪��s�1ʠ���?�&I���nm�tNk!n�ɣZ�r�V�x(tH�;�EĘ�c �{%��PՇ���-RFvM}q�;��’U���7; ;S0�� �-m�.@�i��Le�[�����襽�2��l}I�;��|?��A��>�f��3�8X�w�Ʀ__��PM�;��3������ģB�j�6x꣣����mϕ����}�k!R�w��TC���^c��”P�g�> un���q�C�p��~���i�aeRj��9=}��ʁ�1�y|����: J��SD7�,��u�OS9D)p3l5��`�k��|�p����xͱ�g����+�F$5jO`l��C��^�䶭�1(bG��CN��l�lP��� ����- �v�.X0oC3�&5 #� ���_U��J�ʉ���԰7vZG՚0x�t��,`� �.�TaW�aʊ�J����w�IU�JP’c�äZ��ʹD6��������F�>’}��_6�_#ή��~�!i=�u�T>~�G���T-����},���}���������ſ�E��r��M�Dy���ء�^q���ϱ�:�_]���uQ~�h��^�]<�E�ڣr�g)�O:ֶ������¶�y�eZ�갆½�qS�isp&��yIIC�n�����Ȋ 0׽|���O��J;�S�b��]az� |ٽa5m��=Ck��9ZX�����v����;���t��$�ƟW��� m��8 endstream endobj 23 0 obj 3686 endobj 24 0 obj [ 12 0 R 13 0 R 14 0 R 16 0 R 18 0 R 20 0 R 21 0 R ] endobj 25 0 obj << /Resources 26 0 R /Type /Page /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /BleedBox [0 0 612 792] /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] /Parent 27 0 R /Annots 24 0 R /Contents 22 0 R >> endobj 28 0 obj << /Name /Im3 /Type /XObject /Length 29 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode /Subtype /Image /Width 121 /Height 20 /BitsPerComponent 8 /ColorSpace /DeviceGray >> stream x���}L�eǿ�w�� ��I��*�fB�J��l�&YFm�l��h1g/:����sM�oTs��-� �M�r���6^�˷�<�{)iD4��>��;�|��<�9P������{+0����^9[2��Bt����`ӌr]Z�c.��Lq�qB�Zg�A���M/]^�G <����*�lYc��K�6;A�l,�N�]M�$0�����D�y5�d���AZS�T�u�� k<��o{X�?|�V�d���3/�

‘Stay At Home Hero’: Biglaw Associate Raps Our Coronavirus Anthem

(Screenshot via YouTube)

The COVID-19 outbreak is really getting the best of us. More than 50,000 people have died from the virus in the United States. The availability of toilet paper is a thing of the past. With social distancing measures in place, professionals are working from home, business on top, pajamas on the bottom, all while fearing for their job security. People have been quarantined for a month (or more), and they’re going stir crazy.  Instead of obeying stay-at-home orders, with some questionable direction from the president to LIBERATE their states, some are out protesting in the streets to reopen their local economies.

What more can we possibly do to protect ourselves from the coronavirus? Russell Hedman, a senior associate at Hogan Lovells, has the answer — in song.

Before you go and inject yourself with bleach, watch the video below:


Staci ZaretskyStaci Zaretsky is a senior editor at Above the Law, where she’s worked since 2011. She’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to email her with any tips, questions, comments, or critiques. You can follow her on Twitter or connect with her on LinkedIn.

Am Law 100 Firm Slashing Salaries And Furloughing Staff

The COVID-19 austerity measures continue to spread through Biglaw. The uncertainty of dealing with the global pandemic has impacted nearly every facet of our society, and the legal profession has been far from immune.

Nelson Mullins, the Biglaw firm that captured the #68 spot on the 2020 Am Law 100 ranking, is the latest firm that has implemented cost-cutting measures. According to multiple tipsters, the firm is anticipating revenue shortfalls. Though they worked on reducing expenses, the firm still needed additional measures.

Ultimately, Nelson Mullins settled on a salary cut system that might result in an associate being “made whole” by the end of the year. A tipster described the salary cut scheme (the firm email on the subject is available on the next page):

Nelson Mullins (2019’s fastest growing AmLaw 100 firm) associates will have a temporary 9% salary reduction per annum (ie ~13.5% gross reduction per remaining paycheck) starting with May 15 paycheck and going through December. Good news is that associates who meet collections goal will “earn” their reduction (aka “holdback”) back within a month of meeting their collection goal. (Nelson Mullins has long had a collections goal in addition to an hours goal. Collection and hours goals must be met by Nov. 30th.) Further, this is separate from bonuses that are given annually for meeting collections and hours goals. Thus, if I meet all my goals, I could get two large paychecks in December.

But, you know, associates have virtually no able to influence collections, so associates can’t really do much more than bill and cross their fingers that clients pay:

On the other hand, in this climate, fewer associates will be able to meet their collection goals even if they bill like crazy–clients are just going to take longer to pay. And associates have little to no agency re collections.

Plus staff has been told they will be furloughed for a week of their choosing between June 1 and September 30. (Firmwide email on staff furloughs available on the next page.)

We reached out to the firm for comment, but have yet to hear back.

If your firm or organization is slashing salaries, closing its doors, or reducing the ranks of its lawyers or staff, whether through open layoffs, stealth layoffs, or voluntary buyouts, please don’t hesitate to let us know. Our vast network of tipsters is part of what makes Above the Law thrive. You can email us or text us (646-820-8477).

If you’d like to sign up for ATL’s Layoff Alerts, please scroll down and enter your email address in the box below this post. If you previously signed up for the layoff alerts, you don’t need to do anything. You’ll receive an email notification within minutes of each layoff, salary cut, or furlough announcement that we publish.


headshotKathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).

Everyone Seems To Be Overreacting To These Boies Schiller Departures

It must suck to announce to the world “we’re making major changes” and still having to deal with a constant drumbeat of stories sharing deep concerns that the firm might be changing. It seems like every time a group of partners leaves Boies Schiller, the accompanying media write-up frets that this might be the product of some sort of financial trouble brewing for the firm, or a calculated lateral raid by peer firms, or some kind of rejection of David Boies himself.

Here’s a radical thought… maybe it’s because they told you this was going to happen from the start.

In the latest iteration of Chekhov’s Departure Memo, 15 California-based attorneys announced that they’re leaving the firm, resulting in stories characterizing the lawyers “defecting.” Indeed “defect” is the most popular term when it comes to covering Boies Schiller — you see it here, here, and in here… as legal journalists, we really need a thesaurus. But digging deeper, most of the attorneys in this move are products of the 2017 tie-up with Caldwell Leslie & Proctor, which would make them fairly likely candidates to move on if the stated goal of the firm’s new leadership is to scale back and bring the firm back to its core.

Which is exactly what the firm’s managing partners, Natasha Harrison and Nick Gravante, have been saying out loud for a while now. “With 350 litigators it was difficult to be a firm that limited itself to only the best and most important matters,” Gravante told the Financial Times. Over the years, the firm has built an eclectic group of partners seemingly tied together only by the fact that they’re all talented. And while that’s been true within the big city offices, it’s also the big reason why the firm has outposts in places like Albany and Hanover, New Hampshire. It’s somewhat to be expected of a firm with a well-known entrepreneurial comp structure — when pay is so heavily eat-what-you-kill it can create a “gathering of fiefdoms” where everyone’s off doing their own thing without a unifying vision. As the firm grew, it left you wondering whether it was trying to craft itself as a DLA Piper with offices everywhere and prepared to take on matters great and small or a Williams & Connolly with a narrow focus on the most high impact of cases. There are merits to both approaches, but in the end a firm needs to choose.

That’s not to say that the firm isn’t losing incredibly talented attorneys, but feeding that many mouths requires a lot of far-flung work for a firm that doesn’t have a transactional arm generating a steady flow of cash. While it’s potentially the biggest and most consequential litigation of the next few years, the fight for pandemic insurance coverage isn’t going to support everyone on the BSF roster, but it’s the fight the firm wants to be in. That’s the brand.

It feels as if attorneys with more routine business litigation portfolios that fit within the confines of traditional Biglaw firms are seizing the opportunity to decamp for there, while the attorneys focused on — no-pun intended — David and Goliath insurance fights with far-reaching repercussions for the economy are staying. In fact, if this is what’s happening, we shouldn’t be shocked to hear of more departures before all is said and done. Everyone’s just flowing to where their books are best served, which isn’t cause for concern on anyone’s part.

Considering the alternative interpretations of these moves getting tossed around, this makes the most sense. “Financial trouble brewing at the firm”? We can’t go 10 minutes without another report of a layoff or pay cut, meanwhile Boies Schiller is still running its summer program, hasn’t laid people off, and hasn’t cut compensation. “Calculated lateral raid”? It’s not like when Morgan Lewis swiped 75 percent of Bingham’s partners. The folks leaving BSF are going to a wide variety of firms. “Rejection of David Boies”? This is the weirdest theory being bandied about. The American Lawyer story tosses in a non-sequitur about a New York Times article about Boies’s work going after Jeffrey Epstein as if that’s why the firm has new managing partners and suggests the California lawyers — who reportedly had issues meshing their business with BSF’s rates — were unhappy with the firm having represented Harvey Weinstein in the past, which seems a gratuitous jab since the Weinstein stuff came to light almost three years ago at this point. Theranos has been defunct for two.

Look, Boies Schiller has lost a lot of attorneys. But instead of trying to read some deep meaning into individual lateral moves, maybe consider that what’s happening is “that thing they said was going to happen.”

15 Boies Schiller Flexner Partners Defect in California, Most to King & Spalding [American Lawyer]
Boies Schiller law firm restructures during pandemic [Financial Times]


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

How A Surprise Trip To Ethiopia Gave Me Hope In The Time Of COVID

“Travel isn’t always pretty. It isn’t always comfortable. Sometimes it hurts, it even breaks your heart. But that’s OK. The journey changes you; it should change you. It leaves marks on your memory, on your consciousness, on your heart, and on your body. You take something with you. Hopefully, you leave something good behind.” Anthony Bourdain.

As the world was beginning to sequester into lockdown and come to the realization that Covid-19 was not just China’s problem, but OUR problem, I found myself traversing through eerily empty international airports en-route to Ethiopia. My week in Ethiopia would consist of completing an assignment to meet with families who lost their loved ones in the Ethiopian Airlines ET302 plane crash, followed by a side trip to some of the most remote tribes in the world – a place where they are only now ending the ritualistic killing of “cursed” children born out of wedlock and where “Lucy,” the world’s most famous early human ancestor, was found (her remains are 3.2 million years old).

In my thirty-eight years on this planet, I have traveled to seventy-nine countries in a quest to reach one hundred. I travel mostly for pleasure, sometimes for work. Ethiopia was my seventy-eighth country. I embarked on this trip without the realization that this place would instill me with a profound new perspective on life I would desperately need in the coming months in light of this Covid nightmare.

How did I get to Ethiopia in the first place? Flashing back to “ski week” in California, I was standing by a pool with my friend Cathy and our three children at a hotel in Lake Tahoe feeling somewhat sorry for my eight-year old son who had shed a few tears earlier in the day about the lack of snow. Climate change had ruined his ski week. At that moment, my colleague Craig Brown, CEO of Bridgeline Solutions, our temporary legal placement division, called me and asked if I’d like to go to Ethiopia in two weeks. “Of course,” I replied, “for what?”

Craig was asked by Ken Feinberg and Camille Biros, Administrators of the Boeing Financial Assistance Fund and long-time clients of Bridgeline on domestic and international matters requiring contract attorneys, to go to Ethiopia himself to assist the Fund, but, when Craig couldn’t go, I jumped at the opportunity to represent Bridgeline on this journey. Ken and Camille are renowned in the area of distributing monies on behalf of governments and corporations in high profile matters, such as the 9-11 Victim Compensation Fund, BP Deepwater Victim Compensation Fund and TARP, the bailout of America’s banks in 2009.

These two brilliant and thoughtful minds, Ken, a lawyer by trade, and Camille, an eminent business leader, have now been charged with divvying up a $50 million fund for the families of the crash victims and another $50 million fund Boeing has set aside for community projects to memorialize their loved ones. And I had been tasked with traveling to Ethiopia for the one-year anniversary of the tragedy to commiserate with the families and answer any questions they might have about accessing the Fund.

As a world traveler who missed the international pro bono work, I had been able to do as a corporate attorney working in BigLaw prior to my beloved career in legal recruiting, I felt this task was the assignment I had been waiting for. As a Principal at Lateral Link, the part I love most about my job is learning about the work that attorneys do as I meet with them to assist in their transition to a new law firm.  The human interaction component of my job is fantastic, but nothing can quite replicate the satisfaction that came from the international pro bono work I was able to do in my previous career.

Joining me on this trek to the other side of the globe was Kerry, my great friend, fellow humanitarian, travel companion and international public health expert. Kerry had actually worked for UCLA in disaster preparedness for pandemics, and so, not only was she there to join me in meeting with the family members, the two of us acting as the sole on the ground representatives of the Fund, but also she was the one who kept us Covid-free, obsessively wiping down our plane seats and pointing out anyone who coughed near us or on our baggage. She was also able to predict just about everything that was about to unfold in the pandemic before it actually happened. Just like magic.

We arrived in Addis on a Sunday morning, two days before the anniversary of the crash, and were tasked with meeting with victims’ families, both being an empathetic ear and learning and documenting the ideas and missions they had come up with in order to honor their lost loved ones. We learned about the groups and associations the victims’ families had tirelessly formed in order to get through the grieving process together. We listened intently to their ideas on how the Fund could both memorialize their loved ones and allow them to support charities they felt could leave a lasting legacy in place of all that they lost.

As I sat at a meeting with the first association, a group of French family members, and they went around the table to introduce themselves and who they had lost, including siblings and children whose lives were really just beginning having recently graduated from college, or those about to embark on the journey of a new marriage, I was brought to tears. I had not lost anyone in a plane crash, but their pain seeped across the table and enveloped me in a way I simply could not contain. One woman had lost her twenty-something daughter, also her best friend. I thought of my own six-year-old daughter, and how close we are. I could not and still cannot imagine the depths of their pain. And there I was, the only one at a table of ten people, sobbing, without veil of professional decorum. The French association graciously shared their Kleenex and the President of the Association, Virginie, a mother around my age who lost her brother in the crash, thanked me several times for my tears.

Others were angry, and while defensiveness is a normal reaction when you are confronted with anger, I felt nothing but pure empathy here.

I was struck by the variation in stages of the grieving process I was confronted with in each meeting. One man I spoke with, Solomon, lost his wife, the love of his life and the mother to their young daughter. He simply did not want to carry on. And how could I blame him? I came to represent the Fund, but I wanted nothing more than to reach across the table and give him a hug. He had met his wife when they were both in law school in Ethiopia, a story I knew all too well.

Everyone we met with had a story, all tragic, relatable and indiscriminate.

I met another man who was the epitome of strength and perseverance. Paul had lost his wife, his mother-in-law, and his three young children in the crash. While some of the people we met with in Addis had been understandably paralyzed by grief, others had focused on rebuilding their lives. Paul had bravely put his grief towards advocacy. He had tirelessly worked lobbying for aviation safety, even testifying in front of the United States Congress.

It was one thing to read their stories in the New York Times but sitting face to face with this beautiful group of people, with pain so apparent in their eyes, was truly transformative. This could have been my family, my loved ones, or even my children growing up without their mother. I guess that feeling of being able to relate to each and every one of the victim’s family members is part of the power of the human experience and one of the positives of this global pandemic where the world is coming together to help one another. It reminds me of being in New York on September 11th; in an instant the country changed, and we were all in it together. And with Covid-19 that has happened again, only this time on a global scale.

The resilience of everyone we met with was remarkable and is something we could all use right about now in the midst of this global pandemic. How can we keep moving forward? Can we use our resilience and strength to better our situation and make a positive impact on those around us, or will we crumble in our own misery? It is our story to write.

Flashing back to the week before my trip to Ethiopia, I was in the parking lot of a grocery store, daydreaming of Africa, while discussing the more mundane aspects of parenting and balancing work (paid and volunteer) with the other moms in my daughter’s Girl Scout’s troop. Here we are in Marin County, outside of San Francisco, California, a parental utopia of sorts, or at least a place that purports itself to be that way. A place where my son, at five years old, once lamented that he was the only kid in his class who didn’t yet know how to ski, a kid that is now confronted with problems as grand as a true lack of snow, having to settle for skiing in the homemade stuff during his ski week in beautiful Lake Tahoe. I get it, we all have our own struggles and they are all legitimate. But what I personally need in my life, every now and again, is a dose of pure reality; to understand my place in this crazy universe.

The reason I decided to travel to Ethiopia to take on this emotionally challenging endeavor in the midst of a brewing pandemic is simple. Travel is the only way I can actually understand and make sense of my own reality and experience. The world is only as big or small as you make it and when I choose to stay home and confine myself to my small town, that is my world.

Whether travel is hopping on a plane and flying halfway across the world, or even jumping in my car and driving to a Chinese grocery store in Oakland, spending countless hours and disposable income traveling has always been far more valuable to me than keeping up with the fancy kitchen remodels that clearly are an important part of my “local” California culture.

Again, it’s all about perspective. And now is as good a time as any to evaluate what we all individually want and actually need in our lives. Do I need that kitchen remodel? No. Do my walls need to be painted? Yes.

Suddenly, in Ethiopia, I found myself, meeting with mothers like myself, who had more to deal with than planning the organizational nightmare that is Girl Scout cookie sales (I’m not kidding. I have not and will never volunteer to run that “program”). These women from around the world who congregated in Addis Ababa for the memorial of the crash were balancing work and child rearing while grieving family members who died too soon.

Clariss was an incredible woman and mother I will never forget. She lost her twenty-four-year-old daughter Danielle in the crash. Danielle was a true world diplomat, marathon runner, valedictorian and fundraiser extraordinaire who brought Canadian indigenous communities together to tackle environmental issues. Clariss now signs every email with “treasure your family, they are the home you will carry in your heart forever.” Wise words that give me perspective each time I feel overwhelmed sheltering in place with two active children who bring me immense joy but who also make me feel like I’m a zoo keeper in a wild animal den, or, let’s be real, a cast member of the now iconic Tiger King show.

PART II: JOURNEY TO THE TRIBES OF THE OMO VALLEY

After my mission for the Fund was over, Kerry and I traveled to the Omo Valley of Ethiopia to meet with some of the most remote tribes on earth. Omo Valley is a UNESCO World Heritage Site, known for its importance in the study of human evolution.

One of our first challenges took place when our driver got lost on a dirt road, six hours or so into our trip with no signs of civilization, no cell phones, no food or water. As the sun was setting and our anxiety was brewing, we finally came across signs of life in three members of the Kara tribe walking along the river. We shared lollipops we had in our bags and exchanged smiles and expressed awkward gestures of “we come in peace.”  Kerry whispered, “this is incredible,” and told me to take notice of the young woman trying to take the wrapper off the lollipop we had handed her. She had clearly never seen one, didn’t know how to unwrap this treat, or probably any edible item arriving in a package. What a contrast to our having grown up with most of our foods, even the local, organic, farm-to-table compostable, in some sort of disposable wrapping. The only packaged food these tribes had seen came in the form of corn, dropped in a large white sack from a small plane sent by the World Food Program.

It would only get more interesting from there.

After a short plane flight and a long car ride on unpaved, unmarked roads (“African massage”), Kerry and I were fortunate enough to arrive at the incredible Lale’s Camp, where we spent a few days with several fascinating tribes.

Legend has it that the people of the Omo Valley did not know Ethiopia existed until after World War II, but what we found is during the Coronavirus pandemic, which in some ways seems like World War III without a human enemy, is that some of the tribal people still do not know that Ethiopia exists. In their minds, we came from Jinka, the “big” city a few hours away by dirt road. To these beautiful people, we were “ferenji,” the Amharic word for foreigner, so yes, different, but American, what’s that??? As we heard snippets of news from around the world through a spotty portable Wi-Fi, we learned no one in this area had heard of Coronavirus, stock markets, Tom Hanks, the NBA, or even Disneyland.  We learned that George and Laura Bush had visited this camp a few years ago and nobody knew who they were or frankly even cared. The tribal people of the Omo Valley just found them odd for requiring a forty-two-person security detail that had to accompany them everywhere and check out their next location before they even arrived. I would have loved to see the Secret Service show up to these tribes with their entire “tribe.”  I wonder if they too had to pull over on the boat for a crocodile check before they got out to pee in the bush.

There is no doubt all of humanity aches for the ill and feels compassion for the needless loss of human life, but as news spread that the world as we know it was falling apart, we found ourselves in a place where the cancellation of March Madness, the closure of Disneyland, and the deterioration of our stock markets had little significance.

My headspace suddenly shifted. The sense of urgency I felt to get some air conditioning into my house and coat my walls with fresh paint before summer all but disappeared. Instead, I found myself wondering if there was any way to solve the clean water crisis that was right there in front of me as a mother pleaded with our guide Lale to help her solve the dispute she had gotten into with one of her husband’s other wives over access to water for her children. This mother, again, around my age (although nobody in the Omo Valley actually knows or keeps track of how old they are), just wanted to give her children some water. She wasn’t even going to take any for herself, she explained, and, anyway, the tribe was supposed to share with each other. Looking back, why didn’t I just give her the water I had in my water bottle? I had shared with others on subsequent tribal visits, but why not her?

We saw this time and time again. We learned we weren’t supposed to give the tribes money or candy as Lale, our fearless leader and tribal elder, explained, in order to maintain their culture, but water was OK. Water is a fundamental human right. And when another person asks you for water, and you have some in your bag, you have to share. I guess it’s like the toilet paper struggles folks in the US and other countries who haven’t adopted that bidet lifestyle are dealing with right now?

Again, it’s all relative.

People travel for so many reasons. Many of them try to escape the reality of their daily grind and take a break. Most people find it relaxing to fly to Hawaii and park on a beach at a resort for five days, a typical American vacation. And I get it. Kerry and I are different. We love the ocean but there is nowhere in the world we would rather be and nothing more profound than traveling in order to step out of our world and into another. There is learning and growth that happens when we land in a place that makes us feel at least somewhat uncomfortable. Many parts of my trip to Ethiopia were like that. I was rarely comfortable and can only think of a few short moments where I actually felt relaxed. Yet the impact the experience had on my life and current reality is unparalleled. And here we all are now in the midst of this pandemic, experiencing a reality that only the handful of those of us on the planet who were alive during the Spanish flu can actually comprehend.

As nightfall turned to day we visited more tribes over the course of the next several days and learned that they still practice arranged marriages, where they marry off their teenage daughters for the sum of one hundred and twenty-seven goats. Some of the issues the tribal communities face include lack of access to clean water and food security, most recently due to changing weather patterns, heavy rains and floods, or damming of their rivers by industries exploiting the natural resources their ancestors had used to sustain themselves since literally the dawn of civilization.  I guess when basic human needs are lacking, people don’t have much choice but to trade the assets they do have, even if those assets are their children. It’s insane to think about but it does grant perspective when your second grader doesn’t get through the sixty-five-page packet of work he’s supposed to do in a week. What can I say- I’m just not that stressed about it. My child has the chance to go to school, at least through age twenty-two, food on the table, some of the best water in the country coming right from his sink, and he even can ski, sort of.

Ever since the influx of AK-47 guns from South Sudan and Somalia, the indigenous wildlife that some African countries have protected and rely upon for tourism, is now missing in Ethiopia. A drive through the Omo Valley, a place where our guide grew up among lions, giraffes and elephants, is now void of wildlife, except for those the tribal people use for farming.

Covid-19. Yes, you are a force to be reckoned with. Yes, you have taken over our lives and our livelihoods. You have tried to conquer all of us. You have even gotten dangerously close to people in my inner circle – David Lat and Craig Brown (who sent me to Ethiopia in the first place), my incredible and fierce colleagues who battled this virus, faced death and came out the other side. Still, you continue to wreak havoc on our lives and, like travel, have likely changed all of us forever.

Or as Robert Griffin III, Baltimore Ravens quarterback bluntly put it, “whoever said one person can’t change the world, never ate an undercooked bat.” Ha.

RETURN TO CALIFORNIA

Upon returning to California, I found myself coming home to notably different circumstances and a world I almost didn’t recognize. What keeps me each and every day from crumbling into my own stress, anxiety and even misery, places I have been in a not-so-distant past, is Ethiopia and the beauty and resilience I found in human life there.

I keep in touch with both Lale, our guide and tribal elder who maintains that the people of the Omo Valley still know nothing of the Coronavirus, and Clariss, one of the victim’s mothers who continues to send me writings and videos of her daughter which I treasure. In the words of Danielle Moore, 24-year-old ET302 victim, “in the midst of changing times, in the midst of a looming future, we can also revel in the idea that such a change/collapse can bring upon a new way of life. So, I choose hope, and that’s what I hope to share.”

The challenges I face on a daily basis in this crazy time along with all other working parents, of figuring out how to entertain and school our precious children, while simultaneously working and fielding internal battles with the stress of the unknown (including the local and world economy, our future and even physical health) are real, however, for now, my family and friends (finally) are healthy, we have access to clean drinking water and an unlimited supply of food. And while I may show up at my local Costco and find they are temporarily sold out of organic chicken breasts and toilet paper; I have no problem feeding my family or even supplying my kids with a variety of treats their Omo Valley counterparts have never even dreamed of. And so, I thank you Ethiopia, and everyone I met there, for saving me from the most difficult part of this journey through life in the time of Covid, the internal battle I have conquered with my own mind that has enabled me to stay positive, hopeful and anxiety-free. Thank you for being the administrator of my rescue.

Sarah Morris is a Principal in the San Francisco office where she focuses on placements of partners, counsel, and associate candidates in all fields of law for law firms and companies. Her focus is primarily on the California market. Prior to recruiting, Sarah spent five years as an M&A associate at Skadden Arps in Silicon Valley. Sarah has also worked as an attorney in London and in-house at two companies. Sarah holds a J.D., from Boalt Law School and a B.A. in Social Welfare from UC Berkeley.


Lateral Link is one of the top-rated international legal recruiting firms. With over 14 offices world-wide, Lateral Link specializes in placing attorneys at the most prestigious law firms and companies in the world. Managed by former practicing attorneys from top law schools, Lateral Link has a tradition of hiring lawyers to execute the lateral leaps of practicing attorneys. Click ::here:: to find out more about us.

How To Do The Best Job In Law While In Quarantine

There were certain things that were supposed to happen as the Spring 2020 law school semester drew to a close. 3Ls across the country were to be celebrating with friends and family the life-changing achievement of earning a J.D. 2Ls and 1Ls were to be preparing for their summer jobs, many of which would be Biglaw summer associate positions. And I was to watch the Kansas Jayhawks romp their way through the NCAA Tournament en route to the program’s third national title in my lifetime. COVID-19 changed all of that.  Most tragically, so far 185,000 people have been killed by the disease, including nearly 48,000 Americans. But the impact has also had a ripple effect on law schools. Graduating 3Ls are celebrating by themselves or with family through social distancing methods such as Zoom — it has taken over the rest of the law school life, so why not graduation as well.  Summer associate programs have been significantly altered, with a sizable number cutting their length, and a growing number going completely remote. And while least significant in the grand scheme of things, I was prevented from watching Devon Dotson and Marcus Garrett throw lobs to Udoka Azubuike all the way to Atlanta.

I have previously written in this space that I think being a summer associate is the best job that anyone can have in the legal industry, but inherent in that contention was the seemingly straightforward concept that as a summer associate you would actually be working in the offices of the firm in question.  2020 has presented society with a host of novel questions, including: “is there a limit on the amount of Netflix a person can consume in one day?” and “what percentage of the population are willing to gamble on mass death in an effort to restart the economy?” — the answers being, respectively, “I don’t know because I have four kids home from daycare” and “a surprisingly large number.” To that pile we can add one specifically focused on legal employment, “is being a summer associate still a great job if you are working remotely?” Having thought about it a decent amount, I believe the answer is yes, provided you take some additional steps.

Whenever I think, or talk with students, about summer associate programs, I typically divide them into two parts: professional and social. While not necessarily equally weighted — though I would contend the weighing is closer to even than some might think — both are important to a successful summer experience. Of these two, the professional portion of the experience is probably the one that is easier to replicate in a remote setting.

Technological advances have allowed students to conduct legal research as thoroughly from the comfort of a couch as they can from the bowels of the law library. Those same innovations allow summer associates to work on projects from their parents’ dining room table just as they would from a glass-walled office with a scenic view. Conducting legal research, drafting memoranda, composing legal briefs, and even reviewing prospectuses (I imagine), really only requires a laptop and a strong WiFi connection. In fact, as any former junior litigator (myself included) from the past couple of decades can attest, certain tasks, such as document review, are more tolerable and more efficiently completed at home than at work. With most firms using a web-based system for tracking summer assignments, a summer associate’s workflow should be uninterrupted, regardless of location.

This is not to say that, from a professional standpoint, a remote summer will be identical to the in-person variety. Some things, such as walking into a partner’s or associate’s office to get an assignment or have your questions answered, obviously cannot happen if you and the attorney in question are separated by thousands of miles rather than hundreds of steps. But, even here, some ways can make the remote experience similar, if not superior, to the in-person standard. A good rule of thumb to learn early in a summer is to never enter another office without a legal pad in hand. Failure to take notes when you get an assignment could have you coming back to the attorney with some embarrassingly obvious questions, or have you miss critical portions of the assignment. Remote summer programs will likely have something similar in the form of video conferencing or other ways of directly connecting with attorneys in a more personal manner than just an email or phone call. This might seem more simulacrum than sufficient substitute at first, but there is a potentially hidden benefit. You are still able to take notes on a Zoom call just as if you were sitting in a social distancing inappropriate manner, but even the best note takers can sometimes miss an important point and jot down something incorrectly. One of the benefits of modern technology is that a program such as Zoom lets you record an entire conversation, if you so choose. Now, rather than having to rely on imperfect notes, you can have the actual conversation at your fingertips to review at your leisure. An important caveat, if you go down this recording route, make sure you have the permission of everyone who is going to be on the video conference. Whether you live in a jurisdiction that allows one-party consent for recording is irrelevant since your summer goal is to land a post-graduation offer, not merely avoid prison. No one wants to be the next Linda Tripp.

So if the professional portion of the summer associate program can seemingly be done with some aplomb remotely, what about the social provision? Some scoff when I talk about the social nature of summer programs. But remember that the goal of a summer associate program is to evaluate how a law student will fit in at the firm. A good portion of that fit is based on whether that student can do the legal work required of the position, but a significant portion is based on social or cultural fit. If the social element was completely unimportant, it is unlikely Biglaw firms would have a dedicated summer event budget that stretches to six or even seven figures. Why is the social aspect so important? The students you spend your summer with are, if all goes according to plan, the same people who will join you as first-year associates at the firm. You all will rise up through the ranks together and if everyone stays at the firm for several decades (unlikely) you will all be partners together, and thus intertwined both professionally and financially for the bulk of your adult lives. But more likely than not, people will start to leave the firm as time goes on. The strong bond between a summer class is important in this scenario as well. Say, for example, an attorney leaves and goes in-house somewhere. When that new employer needs to hire outside counsel, an ongoing relationship between former summer associates can ensure the firm where everyone started out is brought on as outside counsel. Law firms like to funnel departing associates into positions with existing, or prospective, clients for a reason. Business reasons aside, the depth of the summer experience means the friendships you make over the relatively short time of just a couple of months can last a lifetime. My family’s holiday card mailing list has more former Sidley summer associates than it does friends from high school, college, and even law school.

So how can these bonds be developed if everyone is scattered across the country? It will take a bit of work, but I think it can be done. Try to set up some face-to-face interactions about something other than case assignments. Students and faculty at Vanderbilt have utilized Zoom Happy Hours to try to bond in our isolated times. Something similar among summer associates can greatly improve camaraderie. Set up a Slack channel, group text thread, or whatever shared-media platform the kids are into today so that everyone can talk to each other — this serves as an alternative to whatever firm sponsored platform (e.g., Microsoft Teams) has been set up, as those channels should be limited to work conversations. Been making your way through various cookbooks during quarantine? Set up a recipe exchange with your fellow summers and if your culinary forte happens to be baking, think about sharing your wares via the U.S. Mail — cookies are easier to ship than Alison Roman’s Baked Ziti.  Just make sure your cooking skills are not Sen. Mark Warner-esque, and thus lead you to instant meme fame. A similar set up can be developed for a litany of hobbies from reading books, knitting, or even woodworking.

This summer class bonding does not merely have to be limited to activities outside of the office. Summer associates helping each other out with various assignments has long been a hallmark of any summer class. Much like remote summers are not going to be able to walk into a partner’s office, there will not be a chance to run into a fellow summer and get some advice on a tough admiralty question. But that does not mean remote summers are completely on their own. Use the technology available to loop in fellow summers on all sorts of work questions. Set up a lunchtime chat where you can share a meal and thoughts about various legal questions that have arisen over the course of the morning.

Obviously the summer of 2020 is going to be a strange one for pretty much everyone on Earth. While a significant change has befallen Biglaw summer associate programs, this does not mean the entire experience if for naught.  In fact, if you take certain steps, the experience can still bear close resemblance to the greatest job in the legal profession. As for me, I will be spending the summer watching the 2008 national championship game on a loop and wondering what could have been.



Nicholas Alexiou is the Director of LL.M. and Alumni Advising as well as the Associate Director of Career Services at Vanderbilt University Law School. He will, hopefully, respond to your emails at abovethelawcso@gmail.com.