Lawyers Manage To Turn Simplest Possible Request Into Absurd, Eye-Bleeding Powerpoint – Above the Law

The

National
Lawyers
Guild

is
the
oldest
and
largest
progressive
bar
association
focused
on
deploying
the
law
in
service
of
advancing
human
rights
and
protecting
ecosystems.
Their upcoming

Law4ThePeople
Convention
,
taking
place
on
October
30th
to
November
3rd,
in
Birmingham,
Alabama
will
bring
together
NLG
members
from
across
the
country
to
hear
from
prominent
advocates
and
accumulate
much-needed
CLE
credit.

But
conferences
aren’t
cheap…

The
NLG
Convention
is
our
most
costly
event
of
the
year,
as
we
not
only
pay
for
staff
time
to
organize
logistics,
but
also
to
cover
the
meetings
costs
of
the
hotel
where
the
convention
takes
place.
Paying
at
the
level
you
can
afford
greatly
helps
us
cover
our
costs,
and
enables
us
to
provide
the
most
accessible
experience
possible
while
still
extending
registration
fee
reductions
to
those
who
need
them.

Rejecting
fixed
fee
registration
is
a
growing
trend
in
event
planning.
Conferences
set
prices,
ideally,
low
enough
to
bring
in
the
minimum
number
of
people
to
cover
costs
without
sacrificing
quality.
But
this
also
presents
a
barrier
to
a
lot
of
folks
who
would
otherwise
attend
AND
leaves
a
lot
of
money
on
the
table
from
people
and
institutions
who
might
otherwise
cough
up
more
than
the
bare
minimum.
Offering
a
sliding
scale
model
provides
relief
where
the
fee
would
be
a
dealbreaker
and
potentially
makes
that
(or
more?)
back
from
those
able
to
pay
more.

In
other
words,
“Here’s
a
suggested
price…
pay
what
you’re
able
to
whether
it’s
more
or
less,
every
little
bit
helps.”
It’s
how
any
number
of
museums
have
operated
for
decades
and
should
be
pretty
straightforward.

But
lawyers
will
be
lawyers,
so
here’s
a
useful
infographic
that
the
NLG
highlighted
to
explain
the
policy.

SlidingScale_RFFM_v2PDF_2019


(click
to
see
full
size
image
in
a
new
window)

I’m
not
confident
in
how
this
all
works,
but
I
think

Pepe
Silvia

gets
a
10
percent
discount.

Pepe

As
a
tipster
put
it:

The
sliding
scale
conference
fee
guide
for
the
NLG
conference
is
kind
of
awesome
but
also
kind
of
overkill.
The
flow
chart
looks
like
a
43
factor
test.

That
sound
you
hear
is
Avril
Lavigne
apologizing
to
the
guy
she
accused
of
going
and
making
things
so
complicated.

Maybe
the
point
is
to
create
a
chart
so
migraine-inducing
that
everyone
just
pays
full
price
so
they
don’t
have
to
look
at
it.
And
to
be
very
clear,
the
guidance
provided
in
this
chart
isn’t
wrong…
if
you
can
decipher
it.
As
a
graphic
design
choice,
few
problems
are
best
solved
by
“4
axes
intersected
by
overlapping
ovals
filled
with
multi-colored
boxes
of
microscopic
print.”
Put
maybe
15
of
these
concerns
into
a
non-exhaustive
set
of
bullets
and
move
on
with
your
day!

Attorneys.
Can’t
make
anything
simple.

Seriously
though,
if
you
have
any
interest
in
the
causes
championed
by
NLG,
consider

registering
for
their
conference
next
month
.

And
if
you
do,
they
have
a
suggested
price…
pay
what
you’re
able
to
whether
it’s
more
or
less,
every
little
bit
helps.




HeadshotJoe
Patrice
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
Feel
free
to email
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments.
Follow
him
on Twitter or

Bluesky

if
you’re
interested
in
law,
politics,
and
a
healthy
dose
of
college
sports
news.
Joe
also
serves
as
a

Managing
Director
at
RPN
Executive
Search
.

The Biglaw Firms That Strike Fear In The Hearts Of Opposing Counsel (2025) – Above the Law

If
you’re
working
in-house
and
dealing
with
bet-the-company
litigation,
you
want
the
very
best
litigators
in
the
world
to
be
on
your
side.
You
want
a
firm
with
litigators
so
strong
that
opponents
gasp
in
fear
at
the
very
mention
of
its
name.
You
want
a
firm
that
is
known
internationally
for
going
for
the
jugular
and
coming
out
on
top.

But
how
can
you
ensure
that
you’ve
picked
the
right
firm?
BTI
Consulting
Group
just
made
it
a
little
easier
with
the
release
of
its
annual
ranking
of
the
firms
most
likely
to
trigger
dread
in
opposing
counsel,
as
determined
by
a
poll
of
in-house
counsel.
Per
BTI’s
Michael
Rynowecer,
“Top
legal
decision
makers
point
to
84
law
firms
they
don’t
want
to
see
on
the
other
side.
Only
[four]
of
the
84
law
firms
clients
don’t
want
to
litigate
against
stand
out
as
the
most
fearsome.”
The
“Fearsome
Foursome”
are
the
most-feared
litigation
firms
in
the
country.
These
are
the
firms
you
do
not
want
to
see
on
the
other
side,
the
firms
that
give
GCs
nightmares.

So,
which
firms
are
being
honored
this
year
for
their
ability
to
strike
fear
in
their
opponents’
hearts
and
minds?

  • Quinn
    Emanuel
    (this
    is
    the
    firm’s
    third
    year
    in
    the
    top
    spot)
  • Kirkland
    &
    Ellis
  • Skadden
  • Gibson
    Dunn

The
BTI
report
also
named
five
firms
as
“Feared
Opponents”

firms
with
lawyers
corporate
counsel
would
prefer
to
steer
clear
of
in
litigation
(in
alphabetical
order):

  • Cravath
  • Jones
    Day
  • Susman
    Godfrey
  • Weil
  • WilmerHale

BTI
has
also
introduced
an
additional
46
law
firms
as
“Awesome
Opponents”
and
29
firms
as
“Intimidating
Opponents”
(i.e.,
firms
clients
would
“rather
not
see”
in
litigation).
Click

here

to
see
the
full
lists.

Congratulations
to
all
of
these
hardworking
firms,
and
good
luck
to
those
who
oppose
them
in
court

it
certainly
sounds
like
you’ll
need
it.


Clients
Single
Out
84
Law
Firms
Most
Feared
in
Litigation

[Mad
Clientist
/
BTI
Consulting]



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.

Morning Docket: 09.12.24 – Above the Law

*
Nevada
rejects
NCBE
test
to
forge
new
attorney
licensing
regime
front-loading
requirements
during
law
school
so
“law
graduates
could
be
cleared
to
practice
within
weeks
of
completing
their
studies.”
[Reuters]

*
Judge
settles
suit
with
law
firm
that
threatened
to
release
nude
photos.
[ABA
Journal
]

*
A&O
Shearman
blasted
by
senior
attorneys
over
shock
office
closure.
[Law.com
International
]

*
Train
CEO
fired
after
taking
a
break
from
causing
labor
disputes
and
derailments
to
have
an
affair
with
the
general
counsel.
[CNN]

*
Former
Biglaw
tech
staffer
caught
selling
firm
laptops.
How
much
do
6-year-old
Dells
go
for
anyway?
[LegalCheek]

*
Latest
post-Chevron
casualty:
mental
health.
[Bloomberg
Law
News
]

*
Judge
blocks
Utah’s
latest
attempt
to
age-gate
the
internet.
[AP
News
]

Breaking The Silence: Unusual Insights On Mental Health In Law From Mariette Clardy-Davis – Above the Law

Recently,
I
had
a
powerful
conversation
with
Mariette
Clardy-Davis,
an
inspiring
in-house
counsel
and
a
fierce
advocate
for
mental
health
awareness.
Her
story
isn’t
just
about
overcoming
adversity;
it’s
a
call
to
action
for
all
of
us
in
the
legal
profession
to
rethink
how
we
handle
mental
health

both
for
ourselves
and
our
colleagues.
Here
are
three
unexpected
takeaways
from
our
conversation
that
might
just
change
how
you
approach
your
career
and
well-being.


1.
Breakdowns
Can
Be
Breakthroughs

We’ve
all
faced
moments
when
everything
seems
to
be
falling
apart.
For
Mariette,
her
breakdowns
were
not
just
moments
of
despair;
they
were
pivotal
turning
points.
She
shared
her
experiences
with
intensive
outpatient
treatment,
spending
full
days
at
a
mental
health
facility
to
regain
her
stability.

But
instead
of
viewing
these
moments
as
setbacks,
Mariette
reframed
them
as
breakthroughs.
These
experiences
allowed
her
to
reset,
understand
her
needs
better,
and
build
a
toolkit
for
future
challenges.
In
a
profession
where
vulnerability
is
often
mistaken
for
weakness,
Mariette’s
story
is
a
bold
reminder
that
sometimes,
hitting
rock
bottom
can
be
the
foundation
for
a
stronger,
more
resilient
self.


2.
Silence
Isn’t
Strength

There’s
a
prevailing
culture
in
law
that
values
stoicism
and
silence,
often
equating
them
with
strength.
Mariette,
however,
highlighted
how
this
silence
can
be
more
damaging
than
protective.
For
years,
she
felt
pressured
to
keep
her
struggles
with
bipolar
depression
hidden,
leading
to
isolation
and
a
sense
of
being
alone
in
her
battle.

By
choosing
to
break
her
silence
and
speak
openly
about
her
experiences,
Mariette
found
that
her
story
resonated
deeply
with
others
facing
similar
struggles.
Her
courage
to
speak
out
not
only
helped
her
heal
but
also
encouraged
others
to
share
their
own
stories.
It’s
a
powerful
reminder
that
true
strength
comes
from
being
open
about
our
vulnerabilities
and
supporting
each
other
through
our
toughest
times.


3.
The
Power
Of
Genuine
Curiosity

Creating
a
supportive
work
environment
doesn’t
require
grand
gestures.
One
of
Mariette’s
most
impactful
pieces
of
advice
was
about
the
importance
of
genuine
curiosity.
Instead
of
the
usual,
“How
are
you?”
she
suggests
asking,
“How
are
you
really
doing?”
and
then
actively
listening.

This
small,
thoughtful
shift
can
make
a
world
of
difference.
It
shows
that
you
genuinely
care
and
are
willing
to
listen
without
judgment,
creating
a
safe
space
for
honest
conversations.
In
a
field
where
everyone
often
feels
pressured
to
appear
flawless,
showing
true
empathy
and
concern
is
a
radical
act
that
can
foster
a
more
supportive
and
understanding
workplace
culture.


Embrace
The
Conversation

I
encourage
each
of
you
to
take
these
insights
to
heart
and
consider
how
you
can
apply
them
in
your
own
professional
lives.
Mental
health
isn’t
just
a
personal
issue;
it’s
a
collective
responsibility.
Whether
it’s
through
more
meaningful
check-ins
with
colleagues
or
by
sharing
your
own
story,
every
action
counts
in
breaking
down
the
stigma
and
building
a
stronger,
more
supportive
legal
community.

Want
to
learn
more
from
Mariette?
Stay
tuned
for
more
insights
from
our
conversation,
where
she
shares
practical
tips
for
fostering
a
healthier
workplace
and
discusses
the
importance
of
mental
health
advocacy
in
the
legal
field.
Remember,
engaging
in
these
conversations
isn’t
just
good
for
your
well-being

it’s
essential
for
creating
a
more
empathetic
and
resilient
legal
profession.




Olga MackOlga
V.
Mack



is
a
Fellow
at
CodeX,
The
Stanford
Center
for
Legal
Informatics,
and
a
Generative
AI
Editor
at
law.MIT.
Olga
embraces
legal
innovation
and
had
dedicated
her
career
to
improving
and
shaping
the
future
of
law.
She
is
convinced
that
the
legal
profession
will
emerge
even
stronger,
more
resilient,
and
more
inclusive
than
before
by
embracing
technology.
Olga
is
also
an
award-winning
general
counsel,
operations
professional,
startup
advisor,
public
speaker,
adjunct
professor,
and
entrepreneur.
She
authored 
Get
on
Board:
Earning
Your
Ticket
to
a
Corporate
Board
Seat
Fundamentals
of
Smart
Contract
Security
,
and  
Blockchain
Value:
Transforming
Business
Models,
Society,
and
Communities
. She
is
working
on
three
books:



Visual
IQ
for
Lawyers
(ABA
2024), The
Rise
of
Product
Lawyers:
An
Analytical
Framework
to
Systematically
Advise
Your
Clients
Throughout
the
Product
Lifecycle
(Globe
Law
and
Business
2024),
and
Legal
Operations
in
the
Age
of
AI
and
Data
(Globe
Law
and
Business
2024).
You
can
follow
Olga
on




LinkedIn



and
Twitter
@olgavmack.

Morning Docket: 09.12.24 – Above the Law

*
Nevada
rejects
NCBE
test
to
forge
new
attorney
licensing
regime
front-loading
requirements
during
law
school
so
“law
graduates
could
be
cleared
to
practice
within
weeks
of
completing
their
studies.”
[Reuters]

*
Judge
settles
suit
with
law
firm
that
threatened
to
release
nude
photos.
[ABA
Journal
]

*
A&O
Shearman
blasted
by
senior
attorneys
over
shock
office
closure.
[Law.com
International
]

*
Train
CEO
fired
after
taking
a
break
from
causing
labor
disputes
and
derailments
to
have
an
affair
with
the
general
counsel.
[CNN]

*
Former
Biglaw
tech
staffer
caught
selling
firm
laptops.
How
much
do
6-year-old
Dells
go
for
anyway?
[LegalCheek]

*
Latest
post-Chevron
casualty:
mental
health.
[Bloomberg
Law
News
]

*
Judge
blocks
Utah’s
latest
attempt
to
age-gate
the
internet.
[AP
News
]

Nevada Could Join Growing Number Of States With Alternatives To The Bar – Above the Law

The
NextGen
bar
exam
was
poised
as
the
shoo-in
successor
to
the
old-and-busted
version,
but
new
challengers
are
popping
up
left
and
right.
The
binary
discussions
centering
around
the
bar
or
diploma
privilege
has
opened
to
include
other
options
like

bar
score
wiggle
room

and
supervised
practice
to
really
get
at
what
the
bar
is
meant
to
test
for

minimal
competency

without
the
baggage
that
comes
with
it.

Reuters

recently
covered
Nevada’s
approach
to
the
step
between
J.D.
and
Esq.:

The
Nevada
Supreme
Court
has
“agreed
to
proceed”
with
an
alternative
lawyer
licensing
process
that
includes
several
traditional
bar
exam
test
components
as
well
as
a
supervised
practice
requirement,
according
to
a
Tuesday
memo
from
Nevada
Board
of
Bar
Examiners
Chairman
Richard
Trachok.

Nevada’s
route
to
practice
will
have
three
parts
that
can
be
finished
in
law
school.
What
a
wild
notion
that
learning
to
think
like
a
lawyer
and
verifying
lawyer
competency
can
be
concurrent!
While
this
does
move
us
closer
to
the
end
goal
of
law
schools
producing
competent
enough
students
who
they
can
walk
from
the
stage
to
their
jobs,
there
will
still
be
some
perfecting
steps:

Under
the
Nevada
Plan,
aspiring
lawyers
will
take
a
100-question
multiple-choice
test
on
foundational
law
offered
four
times
a
year
at
testing
centers,
as
early
as
the
end
of
their
third
semester
of
law
school.
They
must
also
complete
40
to
60
hours
of
supervised
practice

a
requirement
that
can
be
fulfilled
through
a
clinic,
pro
bono
work
at
a
law
firm
or
externships
while
in
law
school.
The
process
concludes
with
a
one-day
performance
test
offered
soon
after
the
end
of
their
last
semester
of
law
school.

It
looks
like
the
plan
will
still
need
some
tinkering,
but
the
Nevada
Supreme
Court
has
said
that
an
official
announcement
will
drop
within
a
year.
Best
of
luck
to
Nevada!


Nevada
Sets
Unique
Alternative
For
Lawyer
Licensing,
Rejects
New
National
Bar
Exam

[Reuters]


Earlier:


Is
The
NextGen
Bar
Really
Next
Up?


Kaplan
Steps
In
To
Dig
California
Bar
Office
Out
Of
Bankruptcy
Hole


Arizona
Offers
Alternate
Path
To
Practice
After
Almost
Passing
Bar



Chris
Williams
became
a
social
media
manager
and
assistant
editor
for
Above
the
Law
in
June
2021.
Prior
to
joining
the
staff,
he
moonlighted
as
a
minor
Memelord™
in
the
Facebook
group Law
School
Memes
for
Edgy
T14s
.
 He
endured
Missouri
long
enough
to
graduate
from
Washington
University
in
St.
Louis
School
of
Law.
He
is
a
former
boatbuilder
who
cannot
swim, a
published
author
on
critical
race
theory,
philosophy,
and
humor
,
and
has
a
love
for
cycling
that
occasionally
annoys
his
peers.
You
can
reach
him
by
email
at [email protected] and
by
tweet
at @WritesForRent.

Morning Docket: 09.12.24 – Above the Law

*
Nevada
rejects
NCBE
test
to
forge
new
attorney
licensing
regime
front-loading
requirements
during
law
school
so
“law
graduates
could
be
cleared
to
practice
within
weeks
of
completing
their
studies.”
[Reuters]

*
Judge
settles
suit
with
law
firm
that
threatened
to
release
nude
photos.
[ABA
Journal
]

*
A&O
Shearman
blasted
by
senior
attorneys
over
shock
office
closure.
[Law.com
International
]

*
Train
CEO
fired
after
taking
a
break
from
causing
labor
disputes
and
derailments
to
have
an
affair
with
the
general
counsel.
[CNN]

*
Former
Biglaw
tech
staffer
caught
selling
firm
laptops.
How
much
do
6-year-old
Dells
go
for
anyway?
[LegalCheek]

*
Latest
post-Chevron
casualty:
mental
health.
[Bloomberg
Law
News
]

*
Judge
blocks
Utah’s
latest
attempt
to
age-gate
the
internet.
[AP
News
]

Top 50 Biglaw Firm Closes Its Second Office In China – Above the Law

Biglaw
firms
are
continuing
to
leave
China,
closing
offices
there
left
and
right

and
this
firm
is
now
shuttering
its
second
office
there
in
the
span
of
just
a
few
months.

As
noted
by

Law.com
International
,
Perkins
Coie
will
now
be
calling
it
quits
in
Beijing,
after

closing
up
shop
in
Shanghai

in
March.
The
firm
offered
the
following
statement
on
the
closure
of
its
Beijing
office:

“We
remain
committed
to
our
presence
in
Asia
and
look
forward
to
continuing
to
advise
many
high-tech
companies
and
entrepreneurs
across
Asia.
With
a
strategic
focus
on
the
major
technology
hub
of
Shenzhen,
we
are
aligning
our
presence
and
work
in
China
more
closely
to
our
clients’
evolving
needs
and
our
long-term
growth
strategy.”

Perkins
Coie
has
applied
to
open
an
office
in
Shenzhen,
and
hopes
to
receive
approval
in
early
2025.
In
the
wake
of
its
most
recent
closure,
the
firm
is
left
with
just
one
office
within
the
region,
in
Taipei.

Which
Biglaw
firm
will
be
the
next
say
zàijiàn
to
its
offices
in
China?
You
can email
us
 or
text
us
(646-820-8477)
if
you
have
any
intel.
Thank
you.


Perkins
Coie
Shutters
Beijing
Office

[Law.com
International]



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.

Morning Docket: 09.12.24 – Above the Law

*
Nevada
rejects
NCBE
test
to
forge
new
attorney
licensing
regime
front-loading
requirements
during
law
school
so
“law
graduates
could
be
cleared
to
practice
within
weeks
of
completing
their
studies.”
[Reuters]

*
Judge
settles
suit
with
law
firm
that
threatened
to
release
nude
photos.
[ABA
Journal
]

*
A&O
Shearman
blasted
by
senior
attorneys
over
shock
office
closure.
[Law.com
International
]

*
Train
CEO
fired
after
taking
a
break
from
causing
labor
disputes
and
derailments
to
have
an
affair
with
the
general
counsel.
[CNN]

*
Former
Biglaw
tech
staffer
caught
selling
firm
laptops.
How
much
do
6-year-old
Dells
go
for
anyway?
[LegalCheek]

*
Latest
post-Chevron
casualty:
mental
health.
[Bloomberg
Law
News
]

*
Judge
blocks
Utah’s
latest
attempt
to
age-gate
the
internet.
[AP
News
]