(Image
via
Getty)
Ed.
Note:
A
weekly
roundup
of
just
a
few
items
from
Howard
Bashman’s
How
Appealing
blog,
the
Web’s
first
blog
devoted
to
appellate
litigation.
Check
out
these
stories
and
more
at
How
Appealing.
“Justice
Elena
Kagan
Calls
for
Enforceable
Supreme
Court
Ethics
Rules;
There
are
flaws
in
the
justices
policing
their
own
behavior,
Kagan
says”: Jess
Bravin
of
The
Wall
Street
Journal
has this
report.
“Appeals
court
timeline
suggests
months
more
of
delay
for
Jack
Smith’s
documents
case
against
Trump;
The
special
counsel
is
appealing
the
dismissal
of
the
case
—
but
the
appeal
likely
won’t
be
resolved
until
long
after
Election
Day”: Kyle
Cheney
and
Josh
Gerstein
of
Politico
have this
report.
“Supreme
Court
justices
are
writing
more
concurrent
opinions
to
accompany
rulings”: Mark
Walsh
has this
report online
at
ABA
Journal.
“Where
Does
Kamala
Harris
Stand
On
Supreme
Court
Reform?
Most
Democratic
politicians
have
been
reluctant
to
endorse
Supreme
Court
reform.
There
are
signs
that
the
party’s
new
nominee
might
see
things
differently.” Jay
Willis
has this
essay online
at
Balls
and
Strikes.
“Pa.
Supreme
Court
considering
Pittsburgh’s
‘jock
tax’
as
city’s
financial
crisis
deepens”: Hallie
Lauer
of
The
Pittsburgh
Post-Gazette
has this
report.
“Supreme
Court’s
Hand-Picked
Advocate
Argues
for
Killing
Richard
Glossip;
Oklahoma’s
attorney
general
believes
Glossip’s
conviction
should
be
overturned;
Chief
Justice
John
Roberts
chose
a
former
clerk
to
argue
that
the
AG
is
wrong”: Liliana
Segura
and
Jordan
Smith
of
The
Intercept
have this
report.