Even in the most ideal of circumstances, going to law school is a crap ton of work. So, I can’t even imagine the fortitude necessary to tackle getting a JD while also cooking a tiny human in your stomach. But it’s true, people do it all the time, and students at one law school say the administration doesn’t support students who are pregnant.
According to a new story from the Belmont Vision, four current and former law students at Belmont University College of Law allege the law school refused to make accommodations to their attendance policy for pregnant students. Those who have come forward are: Juliana Lamar Above the Law famous for bringing her kid with her to get sworn in, said while she was a student at Belmont after an emergency C-section she felt pressured to return to classes before she could even drive herself or carry her textbooks; Cecilia Young is a 3L who says she was denied additional absences despite being diagnosed with a potentially life-threatening condition and being hospitalized post-birth; Kendall Ponchillia, a 3L with a high-risk pregnancy, was also denied additional absences even when she provided a doctor’s note requesting the accommodation; Rachel Clifton a Belmont Law alumni who says she was initially denied any accommodations, including additional absences, by the school’s former Title IX director, but, after raising the issue with Associate Dean of Academic Affairs Ellen Black, she was eventually allowed to pump after the two hour mark during an exam.
The law school has maintained the need to strictly enforce their attendance policy, which limits missed classes to 15 percent — a more draconian standard than most schools impose when interpreting the American Bar Association’s standard of “reasonable” attendance. Most frequently, schools adopt an 80 percent attendance rule.
Provost Thomas Burns said that what the women were actually requesting were exceptions to the attendance policy, and not medical accommodations. The attendance policy, both he and law school Dean Alberto Gonzales said, would not change.
Belmont law’s attendance policy bars students from missing more than 15 percent of classes in a course; any student to exceed that amount will automatically fail the class with a grade of “FN.”
Rather than change the attendance policy, Burns said the school should find ways to assist pregnant students on a case-by-case basis, which can include additional absences.
“What we need to do is find ways that we can support students and make them successful,” Burns said.
But despite these platitudes, women repeated say they were held to the strict attendance policy despite pregnancy related medical issues. Indeed, when a graduate of the law school, Sarah Martin, brought the concerns to the administration, it was quickly clear that very little would change:
Martin met with Dean Black and discussed the women’s difficulties receiving pregnancy-related support from the law school, requesting that the school change its attendance policy.
“It was a very defensive meeting, there was no commitment to do anything,” Martin said. “She was very clear that nothing was going to change about the attendance policy and no accommodations would ever be made.”
Gonzales, the law school’s dean, reached out to Martin via email the week after that meeting, saying that Martin was “correct in assessing that no changes would be made to the attendance policy.”
But that wasn’t the end of the concerns over pregnancy related accommodations. During a regularly scheduled visit to the law school by the ABA, students approached the ABA contingent and spoke to them about their concerns. The ABA brought those concerns to the law school administration, and it seemed the law school softened its stance on pregnancy accommodations:
The ABA brought those concerns to Belmont in a meeting that Gonzales and university President Bob Fisher attended among others. Following the meeting, the law school altered its language in the attendance policy to further clarify that students were to approach Dean Black for pregnancy-related help.
“I think we’ve taken the appropriate steps to make sure that the student’s health is a priority,” said Gonzales in an interview with the Vision last week. “We try to provide the accommodations they need to be successful as a parent, successful as a law student.”
During that same interview, Black affirmed that the law school is doing all it can.
“I have not had an instance where a student has come to me and asked for assistance and I did not provide it,” said Black, adding that the women should continually follow up with her if their situations require medical accommodations.
However, Ponchillia’s pregnancy occurred after the policy was amended. She says, armed with a doctor’s note detailing her high risk pregnancy, she consulted with Black about possible accommodations, and she wasn’t given any help:
“They basically told me to schedule my doctor’s appointments on Fridays so I wouldn’t miss class, that there was nothing they can do for me now, and that they could readdress it in the spring.”
As Martin notes, “The way Kendall [Ponchillia] has been treated makes me think that nothing has changed.”
Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).